·Active Cyber Defense · ISO 27001:2022

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 · NIST SP 800-207 · OWASP GenAI

Sample Monograph ↓•100% Free & Un-Gated · Zero Email Wall

ISO/IEC 27001 & Zero-Trust Defense Audit

93 Annex A controls, kernel eBPF containment, vector RBAC, and air-gapped GPU enclaves.

Checkpoint 01 of 05Kernel Telemetry & Enclaves

~1 min remaining • Tap any card to glide to next checkpoint20% Complete

Annex A.8.15 & A.8.20NIST SP 800-207CIS Critical Control 13

Stage 1 Hard Gate

How does your enterprise monitor raw socket connections and outbound data egress from AI inference nodes?

ⓘ

Auditor Focus: Auditors verify whether GPU compute nodes have kernel-level visibility to detect unauthorized outbound connections or model weight exfiltration.

Optional: Calibrate Monthly Cloud & AI Spend Exposure

$85,000 / mo3-Yr Uncapitalized OPEX: $3.06M

$15k/mo (Growth)$150k/mo (Mid-Market)$500k+/mo (Tier-1 Enterprise)

Standard Cloud Security Groups

Standard VPC firewalls allow egress on port 443; there is no packet inspection or kernel socket telemetry.

VPC Flow Logs

Flow logs captured every 10–15 minutes, but lacking payload inspection, process-to-socket attribution, or real-time alerts.

In-Host Process Whitelisting

OS-level agents restrict network execution to approved binaries with automated alerts on unauthorized outbound TCP connections.

In-Kernel eBPF Telemetry & Hardened Enclaves

In-kernel eBPF sensors capturing raw socket behavior, file descriptor anomalies, and token exfiltration without code instrumentation overhead.

COMMISSIONED 4-VOLUME BOARDROOM MONOGRAPH (96 PAGES)

The Tangible Deliverable

Flip through 6 sample folios from our commissioned 96-page forensic study, or download the sample PDF.

Commission 96p Study

DOCKET: L42-ISO27001-2026-8485

Logic42

SOVEREIGN ENGINEERING PRACTICE

BOARD EYES ONLY

L42-ISO27001-2026-8485

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Statement of Applicability (SoA) & Zero-Trust Enclave Audit

VOLUMES I–IV // COMMISSIONED MONOGRAPH

COVER PLATE // ISO/IEC 27001:2022 ISMS & ZERO-TRUST KERNEL CONTAINMENTCLAUSES 4–10 & 93 ANNEX A CONTROLS

INSTITUTIONAL ASSURANCE & CYBER DEFENSE SERIES

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Statement of Applicability (SoA) & Zero-Trust Enclave Audit

CLIENTSOVEREIGN INFRA BHD

ISMS SCOPE93 ANNEX A CONTROLS

SCORE66.0% (STAGE 1 READY)

BREACH CONTAINMENTZERO-TRUST VERIFIED

Logic42 Sdn Bhd (1656686-V)

96 PAGES • 4 VOLUMES

Logic42 • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

BOARD & COUNSEL

PLATE 1.1 // ISO/IEC 27001 LEAD AUDITOR & PENTEST SEAL

Logic42 BOARD AUDIT RECORDSHA-256 ATTESTED

TO: Chair of the Board Audit Committee, Chief Information Security Officer & VP Infrastructure

RE: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 93-Control Statement of Applicability (SoA), Cloud Pentest & 96-Page Monograph

Pursuant to our ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and Zero-Trust architecture mandate, Logic42 Sovereign Engineering Practice has completed an empirical 93-control Annex A inspection across your Kubernetes clusters, IAM identity fabric, cryptographic key vaults, and AI data enclaves.

Asif M. // Principal Architect, Logic42

MANAGING PARTNER • LOGIC42 SDN BHD

Seal: 0x9F4A...E82C

SIGNED

4-VOLUME ARCHITECTURE (96 PAGES)

VOLUME I: ISMS CLAUSES 4–10 & VaR

01. Letter of Transmittal & ISMS Scopep. 02

02. Clause 6.1 Cyber VaR Quantificationp. 07

VOLUME II: ZERO-TRUST & EBPF X-RAY

05. Kubernetes & VPC Blast-Radius X-Rayp. 25

06. Tetragon eBPF Syscall Containmentp. 32

VOLUME III: 93-CONTROL ANNEX A SoA

09. A.5 Organizational Controls (37)p. 52

10. A.6 & A.7 People & Physical (22)p. 62

VOLUME IV: 90-DAY CERTIFICATION BTO

13. WireGuard & Cilium eBPF Manifestsp. 85

14. Internal Audit & Registrar Packp. 89

FOLIO 02 OF 96

Logic42 • SECTION 03: ACTUARIAL VaRL42-ISO27001-2026-8485

VOLUME I • FINANCIAL QUANTIFICATION

Clause 6.1 Cyber Value-at-Risk (VaR) & Risk Treatment Model

FIG 3.1 // MONTE CARLO VaR SURFACE

93 ANNEX A CONTROLS AUDITEDSTAGE-2 REGISTRAR READY

UNMITIGATED CYBER BREACH VAR

$1,540,000

90-DAY ZERO-TRUST & ISMS BOM

$180,000

POST-HARDENING RESIDUAL

$58,000

EXHIBIT 3.2: STAGE-1 HARD BLOCKER LEDGER (93 CONTROLS)

Control	Finding	Mean VaR
ANNEX A.8.20 [BLOCKER]	Flat east-west Kubernetes pod networking permits lateral movement from compromised workloads	$620,000
ANNEX A.8.24 [BLOCKER]	Database and model encryption keys stored in standard cloud KMS without client-held HSM custody	$540,000
ANNEX A.8.15 [HIGH GAP]	Absence of kernel-level eBPF syscall telemetry (`execve`/`connect`) on production nodes	$380,000

FOLIO 09 OF 96

Logic42 • SECTION 07: TOPOLOGY X-RAYREPRODUCIBLE TRACE

VOLUME II • FORENSIC TELEMETRY

3D Zero-Trust Enclave & Kernel eBPF Containment X-Ray

Isometric 3D Sovereign AI Trust Boundary X-Ray

FIG 7.1 // 4-ZONE PRODUCTION ENCLAVE X-RAY

ZONE 01 // PERIMETER

✓ mTLS WireGuard Mesh

ZONE 02 // K8S EAST-WEST

✕ Flat Pod Subnet

ZONE 03 // KERNEL EBPF

✓ Tetragon Syscall Lock

ZONE 04 // HSM VAULT

⚠ Cloud-Managed KMS

BOUNDARY INSPECTIONEBPF SIGKILL ENFORCED

EXHIBIT 7.4: CILIUM TETRAGON KERNEL EBPF LATERAL-MOVEMENT CONTAINMENT TRACE

syscall_event: process '/bin/bash' spawned by UID 1000 attempting socket connect(198.51.100.42:4444)

> tetragon_enforcer: Matched policy 'deny-unexpected-egress-and-shell' -> Action: SIGKILL (PID 41892 terminated before packet TX)

+ emit_signed_cef_event(annex_a="A.8.15", action="KERNEL_SIGKILL", spiffe_id="spiffe://logic42.local/ns/prod/sa/worker")

SPRINT 1 (DAYS 01–30)

93-Control SoA & RTP

SPRINT 2 (DAYS 31–60)

SPIFFE mTLS & eBPF Lock

SPRINT 3 (DAYS 61–90)

Pentest & Stage-2 Audit

FOLIO 31 OF 96

Logic42 • SECTION 10: AI-SBOM LEDGERVOLUME III

VOLUME III • MODEL PROVENANCE & RESIDENCY

93-Control Annex A Statement of Applicability (SoA) Registry

3D Cryptographic AI-SBOM & HSM Weight Vault

PLATE 10.1 // FIPS 140-3 HSM & ANNEX A EVIDENCE VAULT

SHA-256 MERKLE LINEAGE93 ANNEX A CONTROLS

Artifact	Enclave	Verdict
Annex A.5 — Organizational (37 Controls)	Corporate ISMS Governance	✓ VERIFIED · Stage-1 Ready
Annex A.8.20 — Network Micro-Segmentation	Production EKS / Bare-Metal	✕ BLOCKER · Flat Subnet
Annex A.8.15 & A.8.16 — Logging & Monitoring	SOC Telemetry Enclave	✓ VERIFIED · Tamper-Evident
Annex A.8.24 — Cryptographic Key Custody	Kuala Lumpur HSM Vault	⚠ HIGH GAP · Deploy PKCS#11

CONTROLS

PASS

GAPS

BLOCKERS

FOLIO 54 OF 96

Logic42 • SECTION 15: BTO BOM & SIGN-OFFVOLUME IV

VOLUME IV • TURNKEY REMEDIATION & ATTESTATION

90-Day BTO Handover & CISO Sign-Off

Turnkey 90-Day BTO Sovereign Datacenter Commissioning

PLATE 15.2 // SOVEREIGN ENCLAVE COMMISSIONING

BUILD • TRANSFER • OPERATEZERO VENDOR LOCK-IN

Workstream	Specification	Fixed BTO
WS-01: 93-Control SoA & ISMS Manual	Complete Clauses 4–10 ISMS documentation, Risk Treatment Plan & 93-control Annex A SoA	$42,000
WS-02: SPIFFE/SPIRE & Cilium eBPF	Zero-trust workload mTLS identity mesh + Cilium Tetragon kernel syscall containment	$52,000
WS-03: FIPS 140-3 HSM & WORM SIEM	Client-held HYOK cryptographic key vault + immutable Annex A.8.15 SIEM audit ledger	$46,000
WS-04: Pentest & Stage-1/2 Support	CREST-aligned adversarial penetration test, internal audit & registrar certification pass	$40,000

Unlock BTO pricing & Sample PDF:

BOARD & EXECUTIVE ACCEPTANCEISO 42001 & PDPA SEC. 12A

CHAIR, BOARD RISK COMMITTEE

GROUP CISO / GENERAL COUNSEL

END OF DOSSIERFOLIO 96 OF 96

SPREAD 01 / 03

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 & ZERO-TRUST AI

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 & Zero-Trust AI Cyber Defense Reference Standard

Inspect Normative Clause & Blocker Matrix (4 Vectors)

Traditional perimeter firewalls fail when autonomous AI agents invoke internal tools via the Model Context Protocol (MCP) or ingest untrusted external documents. Our ISO/IEC 27001:2022 & Zero-Trust AI audit evaluates kernel-level eBPF containment, viewport OCR attestation against zero-font PDF exploits, pre-retrieval vector ACL enforcement, and air-gapped GPU enclave security.

Annex A.8.2 & A.8.3Pre-Retrieval Vector Access Control

Blocker: Post-retrieval RBAC filtering leaking restricted embeddings in Top-K searches

Remedy: Enforce tenant and clearance metadata bitmasks inside HNSW index traversal

Annex A.8.7 & RAG DefenseIndirect Prompt Injection & Zero-Font PDFs

Blocker: DOM stream parsers ingesting hidden 0.001pt or white-on-white exploit instructions

Remedy: Deploy dual-pass viewport visibility attestation and optical raster checks

Annex A.8.20 & MCP SecurityAgent Tool & Syscall Sandboxing

Blocker: Autonomous agents executing lateral movement (LOTA) via unauthenticated MCP tools

Remedy: Isolate agent runtimes with gVisor/Firecracker microVMs and eBPF syscall filters

Annex A.8.24 & CryptographyPost-Quantum & Air-Gapped Enclaves

Blocker: Legacy TLS and unverified container registries on private CUDA clusters

Remedy: Implement ML-KEM (Kyber) hybrid mTLS and signed offline air-gap mirrors

STATUTORY & ARCHITECTURAL FAQ

Why is ISO/IEC 27001:2022 insufficient on its own for securing autonomous AI agents?

Standard ISO 27001 controls focus on human IAM credentials and network perimeters. Autonomous AI agents operate with delegated service identities, ingest untrusted third-party PDFs, and execute dynamic tool loops—requiring kernel-level eBPF syscall sandboxing, pre-retrieval vector ACLs, and visual cross-attestation.

How do attackers bypass enterprise firewalls using AI agents and MCP tools?

Through Living Off the Agent (LOTA) and indirect prompt injection. When an agent reads a poisoned document or email, hidden instructions hijack the agent's execution loop, causing it to query internal SQL databases or invoke Model Context Protocol (MCP) endpoints using its own pre-authorized service token.

How does Logic42 prevent zero-font PDF exploits and vector database leaks?

We deploy a dual-pass visual attestation filter that strips any PDF text span lacking rendered pixel contrast before chunking, paired with pre-retrieval cryptographic metadata filtering inside the vector index.

RELATED ENGINEERING FORENSICS

All Briefs

Cyber Security

How does your enterprise monitor raw socket connections and outbound data egress from AI inference nodes?

Standard Cloud Security Groups

VPC Flow Logs

In-Host Process Whitelisting

In-Kernel eBPF Telemetry & Hardened Enclaves

The Tangible Deliverable

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Statement of Applicability (SoA) & Zero-Trust Enclave Audit

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 & Zero-Trust AI Cyber Defense Reference Standard

The Invisible Text RAG Trap: Why Zero-Font PDFs Hijack Copilots

The Model Context Protocol Security Trap: Why Agent Tools Bypass Firewalls

Living Off the Agent (LOTA): AI Tool Loops as Lateral Movement

Stop Filtering Prompts: Why Autonomous AI Agents Require System-Call Sandboxing